Landline Telephone: Difference between revisions
Caseorganic (talk | contribs) Created page with "http://inventors.about.com/od/bstartinventors/a/telephone.htm Category:1800s Category:Unfinished Category:Book Pages" |
Caseorganic (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
http://inventors.about.com/od/bstartinventors/a/telephone.htm | ===Definition=== | ||
A landline telephone is a telephone connected to the public switched telephone network by a physical wire running to a fixed location. The defining property, and the one that matters anthropologically, is in the name: the line belongs to the place, not to the person. | |||
===History=== | |||
Alexander Graham Bell was granted US Patent 174,465 for the telephone on 7 March 1876, days ahead of a competing filing by Elisha Gray, in a dispute that has never entirely settled.<ref>See the summary at [https://www.techtarget.com/whatis/feature/The-history-of-telephones-explained The history of telephones explained], and [https://theconversation.com/rise-and-fall-of-the-landline-143-years-of-telephones-becoming-more-accessible-and-smart-113295 Rise and fall of the landline], The Conversation.</ref> Early service required a direct wire between each pair of subscribers, which is combinatorially impossible at scale; the telephone exchange, with human operators connecting calls by hand, solved this and made the network the network. | |||
The second transformation was automation. Almon Strowger, a Kansas City undertaker, patented an automatic step-by-step switch in 1891 — reportedly because he believed a local operator was diverting calls to a competitor — and the direct-dial exchange it enabled removed the operator from the ordinary call. Subsequent developments were largely refinements of scale and speed: crossbar switching, direct distance dialling, electronic and then digital exchanges, and the SS7 signalling system. | |||
===The Social Form of a Fixed Line=== | |||
Because a landline addresses a place, it produced a set of social arrangements that vanished with it: | |||
* '''The household as the unit of contact.''' Calling a person meant calling their home, and whoever answered was a gatekeeper. Teenagers negotiating privacy with parents, and callers exchanging pleasantries with whoever picked up, were structural features of the technology. | |||
* '''The shared instrument.''' One phone, in a hallway, with a cord of fixed length that determined how private a conversation could be. The length of that cord was a real constraint on family life. | |||
* '''Unreachability as the default.''' Leaving the house meant being uncontactable, and this required no decision, no explanation and no apology. | |||
* '''Memorised numbers.''' Before stored contact lists, people knew dozens of numbers by heart — a cognitive load that the mobile removed and that few people miss, but whose removal made the numbers themselves inaccessible when a device is lost. | |||
* '''The phone book.''' A public directory of everyone's name, address and number, delivered free to every household. That this was uncontroversial for a century is a useful corrective to assumptions about the stability of privacy norms. | |||
===Decline=== | |||
Fixed-line subscriptions have fallen steadily since the early 2000s across most high-income countries, displaced by mobile telephony and voice over IP, with a majority of households in many countries now mobile-only. What survives of the copper network survives largely for other reasons — alarm systems, lifts, rural coverage, and emergency service location, since a fixed line reports its own address in a way a mobile does not. | |||
===Relevance to Cyborg Anthropology=== | |||
The landline is the clearest available baseline for measuring what mobile telephony changed. Nearly every observation in the mobile communication literature — the collapse of unreachability, the shift from place-addressing to person-addressing, the loss of the household gatekeeper — is a comparison against this technology, whether or not it is stated. | |||
===Related Reading=== | |||
* [[Mobile technologies]] | |||
* [[Perpetual Contact: Mobile Communication, Private Talk, Public Performance]] | |||
* [[Cell Phones and Their Technosocial Sites of Engagement]] | |||
* [[Hand Me Up Technology]] | |||
===External Links=== | |||
* http://inventors.about.com/od/bstartinventors/a/telephone.htm | |||
===References=== | |||
<references/> | |||
[[Category:1800s]] | [[Category:1800s]] | ||
[[Category:Book Pages]] | [[Category:Book Pages]] | ||
[[Category:Communication Studies]] | |||
[[Category:Computing History]] | |||
Latest revision as of 13:06, 25 August 2026
Definition
A landline telephone is a telephone connected to the public switched telephone network by a physical wire running to a fixed location. The defining property, and the one that matters anthropologically, is in the name: the line belongs to the place, not to the person.
History
Alexander Graham Bell was granted US Patent 174,465 for the telephone on 7 March 1876, days ahead of a competing filing by Elisha Gray, in a dispute that has never entirely settled.[1] Early service required a direct wire between each pair of subscribers, which is combinatorially impossible at scale; the telephone exchange, with human operators connecting calls by hand, solved this and made the network the network.
The second transformation was automation. Almon Strowger, a Kansas City undertaker, patented an automatic step-by-step switch in 1891 — reportedly because he believed a local operator was diverting calls to a competitor — and the direct-dial exchange it enabled removed the operator from the ordinary call. Subsequent developments were largely refinements of scale and speed: crossbar switching, direct distance dialling, electronic and then digital exchanges, and the SS7 signalling system.
The Social Form of a Fixed Line
Because a landline addresses a place, it produced a set of social arrangements that vanished with it:
- The household as the unit of contact. Calling a person meant calling their home, and whoever answered was a gatekeeper. Teenagers negotiating privacy with parents, and callers exchanging pleasantries with whoever picked up, were structural features of the technology.
- The shared instrument. One phone, in a hallway, with a cord of fixed length that determined how private a conversation could be. The length of that cord was a real constraint on family life.
- Unreachability as the default. Leaving the house meant being uncontactable, and this required no decision, no explanation and no apology.
- Memorised numbers. Before stored contact lists, people knew dozens of numbers by heart — a cognitive load that the mobile removed and that few people miss, but whose removal made the numbers themselves inaccessible when a device is lost.
- The phone book. A public directory of everyone's name, address and number, delivered free to every household. That this was uncontroversial for a century is a useful corrective to assumptions about the stability of privacy norms.
Decline
Fixed-line subscriptions have fallen steadily since the early 2000s across most high-income countries, displaced by mobile telephony and voice over IP, with a majority of households in many countries now mobile-only. What survives of the copper network survives largely for other reasons — alarm systems, lifts, rural coverage, and emergency service location, since a fixed line reports its own address in a way a mobile does not.
Relevance to Cyborg Anthropology
The landline is the clearest available baseline for measuring what mobile telephony changed. Nearly every observation in the mobile communication literature — the collapse of unreachability, the shift from place-addressing to person-addressing, the loss of the household gatekeeper — is a comparison against this technology, whether or not it is stated.
Related Reading
- Mobile technologies
- Perpetual Contact: Mobile Communication, Private Talk, Public Performance
- Cell Phones and Their Technosocial Sites of Engagement
- Hand Me Up Technology
External Links
References
- ↑ See the summary at The history of telephones explained, and Rise and fall of the landline, The Conversation.