Victor Turner: Difference between revisions
Caseorganic (talk | contribs) Created page with '300px|thumb|right|Title ===Biography=== ===Projects=== ====Subproject (if applicable==== ===Further Reading=== * * * ===External Links=== [[Category:P…' |
Caseorganic (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
===Biography=== | ===Biography=== | ||
Victor Witter Turner (28 May 1920 – 18 December 1983) was a British-American cultural anthropologist, one of the central figures of the Manchester School and the leading twentieth-century theorist of ritual. Born in Glasgow to an electrical engineer and an actress, he read English at University College London, served as a non-combatant bomb-disposal soldier during the Second World War, and turned to anthropology afterwards, taking his doctorate at Manchester under Max Gluckman. His fieldwork was among the Ndembu of north-western Zambia between 1950 and 1954. He later taught at Cornell, the University of Chicago and the University of Virginia.<ref>[https://www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/Victor_Turner Victor Turner], biography and bibliography.</ref> | |||
=== | ===Key Ideas=== | ||
* '''Liminality.''' Turner's most influential concept, developed from Arnold van Gennep's tripartite model of rites of passage (separation, transition, incorporation). Turner concentrated on the middle phase — the threshold, ''limen'' — in which the initiate is "betwixt and between," stripped of former status and not yet holding a new one. Liminal persons are structurally invisible, ambiguous, often treated as polluting or sacred, and typically levelled: uniform dress, no rank, submission to authority, and the suspension of ordinary rules. | |||
* '''Communitas.''' The mode of relationship that arises among people in the liminal state: unstructured, egalitarian, intensely felt, and by nature temporary. Turner distinguished spontaneous communitas from the normative and ideological forms that attempt to institutionalise it — and argued that the attempt always fails, because structure reasserts itself. Every monastic order, commune and movement rediscovers this. | |||
* '''Structure and anti-structure.''' The framing of ''The Ritual Process'' (1969). Societies oscillate between structure — the ordinary world of status, role and rule — and anti-structure, the periodic, licensed dissolution of those categories. Anti-structure is not the failure of structure but its necessary complement. | |||
* '''Social drama.''' Turner's method for analysing conflict, developed in ''Schism and Continuity in an African Society'' (1957). Disputes unfold in four phases: breach of a norm, mounting crisis, redressive action (ritual, arbitration, law), and either reintegration or the recognition of schism. The model is deliberately transposable to any social unit, from a village to an institution. | |||
* '''The liminoid.''' A late distinction. In industrial societies the obligatory, collective liminal phase is largely replaced by the ''liminoid'' — optional, individual, commodified experiences (theatre, sport, art, leisure, travel) that do liminal work without the obligation. | |||
=== | ===Selected Works=== | ||
* ''Schism and Continuity in an African Society'' (1957) | |||
* ''The Forest of Symbols: Aspects of Ndembu Ritual'' (1967) | |||
* ''The Ritual Process: Structure and Anti-Structure'' (1969) | |||
* ''Dramas, Fields, and Metaphors'' (1974) | |||
* ''From Ritual to Theatre: The Human Seriousness of Play'' (1982) | |||
* ''The Anthropology of Performance'' (1986) | |||
=== | ===Relevance to Cyborg Anthropology=== | ||
Turner's apparatus transfers to networked life more readily than almost any other classical anthropology. Online communities routinely produce liminal conditions — the newcomer stripped of offline status, levelled by a default avatar, subject to unwritten rules they must learn by transgressing; see [[Internalization of moral code|internalization of moral code]]. Communitas describes the intense, temporary solidarity of an event, a raid, a thread or a crisis, and its reliable decay into hierarchy. And the social drama model is the most useful available template for analysing a platform conflict, because it treats the redressive phase — the moderation, the apology, the policy change — as a structural stage rather than as a failure. | |||
===Related Reading=== | |||
* [[Internalization of moral code]] | |||
* [[Status]] | |||
* [[Social dialect]] | |||
* [[Russ Bernard]] | |||
* [[Charisma]] | |||
===References=== | |||
<references/> | |||
[[Category:People]] | [[Category:People]] | ||
[[Category:Traditional Anthropology]] | |||
[[Category:Digital Anthropology]] | |||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
Latest revision as of 14:02, 25 August 2026
Biography
Victor Witter Turner (28 May 1920 – 18 December 1983) was a British-American cultural anthropologist, one of the central figures of the Manchester School and the leading twentieth-century theorist of ritual. Born in Glasgow to an electrical engineer and an actress, he read English at University College London, served as a non-combatant bomb-disposal soldier during the Second World War, and turned to anthropology afterwards, taking his doctorate at Manchester under Max Gluckman. His fieldwork was among the Ndembu of north-western Zambia between 1950 and 1954. He later taught at Cornell, the University of Chicago and the University of Virginia.[1]
Key Ideas
- Liminality. Turner's most influential concept, developed from Arnold van Gennep's tripartite model of rites of passage (separation, transition, incorporation). Turner concentrated on the middle phase — the threshold, limen — in which the initiate is "betwixt and between," stripped of former status and not yet holding a new one. Liminal persons are structurally invisible, ambiguous, often treated as polluting or sacred, and typically levelled: uniform dress, no rank, submission to authority, and the suspension of ordinary rules.
- Communitas. The mode of relationship that arises among people in the liminal state: unstructured, egalitarian, intensely felt, and by nature temporary. Turner distinguished spontaneous communitas from the normative and ideological forms that attempt to institutionalise it — and argued that the attempt always fails, because structure reasserts itself. Every monastic order, commune and movement rediscovers this.
- Structure and anti-structure. The framing of The Ritual Process (1969). Societies oscillate between structure — the ordinary world of status, role and rule — and anti-structure, the periodic, licensed dissolution of those categories. Anti-structure is not the failure of structure but its necessary complement.
- Social drama. Turner's method for analysing conflict, developed in Schism and Continuity in an African Society (1957). Disputes unfold in four phases: breach of a norm, mounting crisis, redressive action (ritual, arbitration, law), and either reintegration or the recognition of schism. The model is deliberately transposable to any social unit, from a village to an institution.
- The liminoid. A late distinction. In industrial societies the obligatory, collective liminal phase is largely replaced by the liminoid — optional, individual, commodified experiences (theatre, sport, art, leisure, travel) that do liminal work without the obligation.
Selected Works
- Schism and Continuity in an African Society (1957)
- The Forest of Symbols: Aspects of Ndembu Ritual (1967)
- The Ritual Process: Structure and Anti-Structure (1969)
- Dramas, Fields, and Metaphors (1974)
- From Ritual to Theatre: The Human Seriousness of Play (1982)
- The Anthropology of Performance (1986)
Relevance to Cyborg Anthropology
Turner's apparatus transfers to networked life more readily than almost any other classical anthropology. Online communities routinely produce liminal conditions — the newcomer stripped of offline status, levelled by a default avatar, subject to unwritten rules they must learn by transgressing; see internalization of moral code. Communitas describes the intense, temporary solidarity of an event, a raid, a thread or a crisis, and its reliable decay into hierarchy. And the social drama model is the most useful available template for analysing a platform conflict, because it treats the redressive phase — the moderation, the apology, the policy change — as a structural stage rather than as a failure.
Related Reading
References
- ↑ Victor Turner, biography and bibliography.