The Significance of the Frontier in American History: Difference between revisions
Caseorganic (talk | contribs) Created page with '{{stub}} ===Author=== ===Description=== ===Related Reading=== Category:Books' |
Caseorganic (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
===Author=== | |||
Frederick Jackson Turner (1861–1932), American historian. He taught at the University of Wisconsin and later at Harvard, and won the Pulitzer Prize in 1933 for ''The Significance of Sections in American History''. | |||
=== | ===Publication Details=== | ||
Read as a paper before the American Historical Association in Chicago on 12 July 1893, during the World's Columbian Exposition. Published in the ''Proceedings of the State Historical Society of Wisconsin'' (1894) and in the AHA's ''Annual Report'' for 1893; collected in ''The Frontier in American History'' (New York: Henry Holt, 1920).<ref>[https://www.americanyawp.com/reader/17-conquering-the-west/frederick-jackson-turner-significance-of-the-frontier-in-american-history-1893/ Full text at The American Yawp Reader].</ref> | |||
===Description=== | ===Description=== | ||
Turner's essay opens from a bulletin of the 1890 census announcing that a discernible frontier line no longer existed. He takes this administrative note as the closing of an era and asks what that era had done to American character. | |||
His thesis, later called the frontier thesis, is that American democracy and the American temperament were produced not by inherited European institutions but by the repeated experience of settlement at the edge of unoccupied land. "The existence of an area of free land, its continuous recession, and the advance of American settlement westward, explain American development." The frontier, on this account, functioned as a perpetual return to primitive conditions and a perpetual re-founding: each wave stripped the settler of European habits and rebuilt a rougher, more individualistic, more practical and less deferential person. Individualism, restlessness, inventiveness, impatience with authority and a certain coarseness were the outputs. The safety valve of free land absorbed discontent that in Europe would have become class politics. | |||
Turner then observes that this process has ended, and closes with a question about what a society formed by expansion does when there is nowhere left to expand. | |||
===Criticism=== | |||
The essay is among the most influential and most thoroughly criticised documents in American historiography. Its central omission is the presence of people: "free land" was occupied, and the process Turner describes as regeneration was, from the other direction, dispossession. The New Western History of the 1980s — Patricia Nelson Limerick's ''The Legacy of Conquest'' (1987), Richard White, Donald Worster — reframed the frontier as a zone of conquest, environmental extraction and multi-ethnic conflict rather than a moving line of civilisation. The safety-valve thesis has also been challenged empirically. Turner's essay is now read less as a description of what happened than as a primary source in the history of American self-understanding. | |||
===Relevance to Cyborg Anthropology=== | |||
The frontier thesis has had an extraordinary second life as the governing metaphor of network culture. "Electronic frontier," "homesteading the noosphere," "settlers," "pioneers," "the wild west of the internet," and John Perry Barlow's "Declaration of the Independence of Cyberspace" all borrow Turner's structure: an open space, free of inherited institutions, that regenerates whoever enters it and produces a freer person. The borrowing carries the omission with it. Reading Turner directly is the fastest way to see what that metaphor was built to leave out — and to ask who was already living on the land that a new platform declares empty. | |||
===Related Reading=== | ===Related Reading=== | ||
* [[From Counterculture to Cyberculture: Stewart Brand, the Whole Earth Network, and the Rise of Digital Utopianism]] | |||
* [[Cyberspace]] | |||
* [[Electronic Frontier Foundation]] | |||
===References=== | |||
<references/> | |||
[[Category: | [[Category:Articles]] | ||
[[Category:Critical Theory]] | |||
[[Category:Future Culture]] | |||
Latest revision as of 13:17, 25 August 2026
Author
Frederick Jackson Turner (1861–1932), American historian. He taught at the University of Wisconsin and later at Harvard, and won the Pulitzer Prize in 1933 for The Significance of Sections in American History.
Publication Details
Read as a paper before the American Historical Association in Chicago on 12 July 1893, during the World's Columbian Exposition. Published in the Proceedings of the State Historical Society of Wisconsin (1894) and in the AHA's Annual Report for 1893; collected in The Frontier in American History (New York: Henry Holt, 1920).[1]
Description
Turner's essay opens from a bulletin of the 1890 census announcing that a discernible frontier line no longer existed. He takes this administrative note as the closing of an era and asks what that era had done to American character.
His thesis, later called the frontier thesis, is that American democracy and the American temperament were produced not by inherited European institutions but by the repeated experience of settlement at the edge of unoccupied land. "The existence of an area of free land, its continuous recession, and the advance of American settlement westward, explain American development." The frontier, on this account, functioned as a perpetual return to primitive conditions and a perpetual re-founding: each wave stripped the settler of European habits and rebuilt a rougher, more individualistic, more practical and less deferential person. Individualism, restlessness, inventiveness, impatience with authority and a certain coarseness were the outputs. The safety valve of free land absorbed discontent that in Europe would have become class politics.
Turner then observes that this process has ended, and closes with a question about what a society formed by expansion does when there is nowhere left to expand.
Criticism
The essay is among the most influential and most thoroughly criticised documents in American historiography. Its central omission is the presence of people: "free land" was occupied, and the process Turner describes as regeneration was, from the other direction, dispossession. The New Western History of the 1980s — Patricia Nelson Limerick's The Legacy of Conquest (1987), Richard White, Donald Worster — reframed the frontier as a zone of conquest, environmental extraction and multi-ethnic conflict rather than a moving line of civilisation. The safety-valve thesis has also been challenged empirically. Turner's essay is now read less as a description of what happened than as a primary source in the history of American self-understanding.
Relevance to Cyborg Anthropology
The frontier thesis has had an extraordinary second life as the governing metaphor of network culture. "Electronic frontier," "homesteading the noosphere," "settlers," "pioneers," "the wild west of the internet," and John Perry Barlow's "Declaration of the Independence of Cyberspace" all borrow Turner's structure: an open space, free of inherited institutions, that regenerates whoever enters it and produces a freer person. The borrowing carries the omission with it. Reading Turner directly is the fastest way to see what that metaphor was built to leave out — and to ask who was already living on the land that a new platform declares empty.
Related Reading
- From Counterculture to Cyberculture: Stewart Brand, the Whole Earth Network, and the Rise of Digital Utopianism
- Cyberspace
- Electronic Frontier Foundation
