<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://cyborganthropology.com/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=The_Third_Culture</id>
	<title>The Third Culture - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://cyborganthropology.com/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=The_Third_Culture"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://cyborganthropology.com/index.php?title=The_Third_Culture&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-04-23T19:52:06Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.45.3</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://cyborganthropology.com/index.php?title=The_Third_Culture&amp;diff=1142&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Caseorganic: Created page with &#039;The Third Culture  The dogma I object to is composed of a set of interlocking beliefs and doesn&#039;t have a generally accepted overarching name as yet, though I sometimes call it &quot;c…&#039;</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://cyborganthropology.com/index.php?title=The_Third_Culture&amp;diff=1142&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2010-08-30T16:27:15Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Created page with &amp;#039;The Third Culture  The dogma I object to is composed of a set of interlocking beliefs and doesn&amp;#039;t have a generally accepted overarching name as yet, though I sometimes call it &amp;quot;c…&amp;#039;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;The Third Culture&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The dogma I object to is composed of a set of interlocking beliefs and&lt;br /&gt;
doesn&amp;#039;t have a generally accepted overarching name as yet, though I&lt;br /&gt;
sometimes call it &amp;quot;cybernetic totalism&amp;quot;. It has the potential to&lt;br /&gt;
transform human experience more powerfully than any prior ideology,&lt;br /&gt;
religion, or political system ever has, partly because it can be so&lt;br /&gt;
pleasing to the mind, at least initially, but mostly because it gets a&lt;br /&gt;
free ride on the overwhelmingly powerful technologies that happen to&lt;br /&gt;
be created by people who are, to a large degree, true believers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Edge readers might be surprised by my use of the word &amp;quot;cybernetic&amp;quot;. I&lt;br /&gt;
find the word problematic, so I&amp;#039;d like to explain why I chose it. I&lt;br /&gt;
searched for a term that united the diverse ideas I was exploring, and&lt;br /&gt;
also connected current thinking and culture with earlier generations&lt;br /&gt;
of thinkers who touched on similar topics. The original usage of&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;cybernetic&amp;quot;, as by Norbert Weiner, was certainly not restricted to&lt;br /&gt;
digital computers. It was originally meant to suggest a metaphor&lt;br /&gt;
between marine navigation and a feedback device that governs a&lt;br /&gt;
mechanical system, such as a thermostat. Weiner certainly recognized&lt;br /&gt;
and humanely explored the extraordinary reach of this metaphor, one of&lt;br /&gt;
the most powerful ever expressed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I hope no one will think I&amp;#039;m equating Cybernetics and what I&amp;#039;m calling&lt;br /&gt;
Cybernetic Totalism. The distance between recognizing a great metaphor&lt;br /&gt;
and treating it as the only metaphor is the same as the distance&lt;br /&gt;
between humble science and dogmatic religion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here is a partial roster of the component beliefs of cybernetic totalism:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. That cybernetic patterns of information provide the ultimate&lt;br /&gt;
and best way to understand reality.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. That people are no more than cybernetic patterns.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. That subjective experience either doesn&amp;#039;t exist, or is&lt;br /&gt;
unimportant because it is some sort of ambient or peripheral effect.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. That what Darwin described in biology, or something like it, is&lt;br /&gt;
in fact also the singular, superior description of all creativity and&lt;br /&gt;
culture.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5. That qualitative as well as quantitative aspects of information systems will be accelerated by Moore&amp;#039;s Law.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And finally, the most dramatic:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6. That biology and physics will merge with computer science&lt;br /&gt;
(becoming biotechnology and nanotechnology), resulting in life and the&lt;br /&gt;
physical universe becoming mercurial; achieving the supposed nature of&lt;br /&gt;
computer software. Furthermore, all of this will happen very soon!&lt;br /&gt;
Since computers are improving so quickly, they will overwhelm all the&lt;br /&gt;
other cybernetic processes, like people, and will fundamentally change&lt;br /&gt;
the nature of what&amp;#039;s going on in the familiar neighborhood of Earth at&lt;br /&gt;
some moment when a new &amp;quot;criticality&amp;quot; is achieved- maybe in about the&lt;br /&gt;
year 2020. To be a human after that moment will be either impossible&lt;br /&gt;
or something very different than we now can know.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Source: [http://www.edge.org/3rd_culture/lanier/lanier_p1.html http://www.edge.org/3rd_culture/lanier/lanier_p1.html]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Articles]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Caseorganic</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>