Technoscience - Revision history

Caseorganic at 06:28, 26 March 2012

2012-03-26T06:28:37Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:28, 26 March 2012
Line 2:		Line 2:
	Technoscience suggests that science and technology are relational, rather than two separate elements. Instead of being separate, Hottois and Latour argue that science is always enabled by technology, and technology and science are co-produced. The notion indicates a common recognition that scientific knowledge is not only socially coded and historically situated but sustained and made durable by material (non-human) networks.		Technoscience suggests that science and technology are relational, rather than two separate elements. Instead of being separate, Hottois and Latour argue that science is always enabled by technology, and technology and science are co-produced. The notion indicates a common recognition that scientific knowledge is not only socially coded and historically situated but sustained and made durable by material (non-human) networks.

	The term Technoscience was coined by Belgian philosopher Gilbert Hottois<ref>Hottois, Gilbert (1984). Le signe et la technique. La philosophie à l’épreuve de la technique, Paris, Aubier Montaigne, Coll. «Res - L’invention philosophique», p.59-60.</ref> in the late 1970s. It has been applied by sociologist Bruno Latour to study scientists and engineers in society, as well as technology and humanity.<ref>Latour, Bruno (1987). Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society. ~~Hardward~~ University Press. ISBN 0674792912.</ref>		The term Technoscience was coined by Belgian philosopher Gilbert Hottois<ref>Hottois, Gilbert (1984). Le signe et la technique. La philosophie à l’épreuve de la technique, Paris, Aubier Montaigne, Coll. «Res - L’invention philosophique», p.59-60.</ref> in the late 1970s. It has been applied by sociologist Bruno Latour to study scientists and engineers in society, as well as technology and humanity.<ref>Latour, Bruno (1987). Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society. Harvard University Press. ISBN 0674792912.</ref>

			===Expand===
			http://www.anthrobase.com/Txt/R/Risan_L_05.htm


	==References==		==References==
	<references />		<references />

	[[Category:~~Finished~~]]		[[Category:Unfinished]]
	[[Category:Book Pages]]		[[Category:Book Pages]]

Caseorganic at 07:20, 18 December 2011

2011-12-18T07:20:08Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:20, 18 December 2011
Line 1:		Line 1:
	===Definition===		===Definition===
	Technoscience suggests that science and technology are relational, rather than two separate elements. Instead of being ~~seperate~~, Hottois and Latour argue that science is always enabled by technology, and technology and science are co-produced. The notion indicates a common recognition that scientific knowledge is not only socially coded and historically situated but sustained and made durable by material (non-human) networks.		Technoscience suggests that science and technology are relational, rather than two separate elements. Instead of being separate, Hottois and Latour argue that science is always enabled by technology, and technology and science are co-produced. The notion indicates a common recognition that scientific knowledge is not only socially coded and historically situated but sustained and made durable by material (non-human) networks.

	The term Technoscience was coined by Belgian philosopher Gilbert Hottois<ref>Hottois, Gilbert (1984). Le signe et la technique. La philosophie à l’épreuve de la technique, Paris, Aubier Montaigne, Coll. «Res - L’invention philosophique», p.59-60.</ref> in the late 1970s. It has been applied by sociologist Bruno Latour to study scientists and engineers in society, as well as technology and humanity.<ref>Latour, Bruno (1987). Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society. Hardward University Press. ISBN 0674792912.</ref>		The term Technoscience was coined by Belgian philosopher Gilbert Hottois<ref>Hottois, Gilbert (1984). Le signe et la technique. La philosophie à l’épreuve de la technique, Paris, Aubier Montaigne, Coll. «Res - L’invention philosophique», p.59-60.</ref> in the late 1970s. It has been applied by sociologist Bruno Latour to study scientists and engineers in society, as well as technology and humanity.<ref>Latour, Bruno (1987). Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society. Hardward University Press. ISBN 0674792912.</ref>
Line 7:		Line 7:
	<references />		<references />

	[[Category:~~Marked for Editing~~]]		[[Category:Finished]]
	[[Category:Book Pages]]		[[Category:Book Pages]]

Caseorganic at 00:59, 6 November 2011

2011-11-06T00:59:44Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:59, 6 November 2011
Line 1:		Line 1:
	===Definition===		===Definition===
	Technoscience ~~is a term coined by Belgian philosopher Gilbert Hottois<ref>Hottois~~, ~~Gilbert (1984). Le signe et la technique~~. ~~La philosophie à l’épreuve de la technique~~, ~~Paris~~, ~~Aubier Montaigne, Coll. «Res~~ - ~~L’invention philosophique», p~~.~~59-60.</ref> in the late 1970s. It has been applied by sociologist Bruno Latour to study scientists~~ and ~~engineers in society, as well as technology~~ and ~~humanity.<ref>Latour, Bruno~~ (~~1987~~). ~~Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society. Hardward University Press. ISBN 0674792912.</ref>~~		Technoscience suggests that science and technology are relational, rather than two separate elements. Instead of being seperate, Hottois and Latour argue that science is always enabled by technology, and technology and science are co-produced. The notion indicates a common recognition that scientific knowledge is not only socially coded and historically situated but sustained and made durable by material (non-human) networks.

	Technoscience ~~suggests that science and technology are relational~~, ~~rather than two separate elements~~. ~~Instead of being seperate~~, ~~Hottois~~ and ~~Latour argue that science is always enabled by technology~~, ~~and~~ technology and ~~science are co-produced~~. ~~The notion indicates a common recognition that scientific knowledge is not only socially coded and historically situated but sustained and made durable by material~~ (~~non-human~~) ~~networks~~.		The term Technoscience was coined by Belgian philosopher Gilbert Hottois<ref>Hottois, Gilbert (1984). Le signe et la technique. La philosophie à l’épreuve de la technique, Paris, Aubier Montaigne, Coll. «Res - L’invention philosophique», p.59-60.</ref> in the late 1970s. It has been applied by sociologist Bruno Latour to study scientists and engineers in society, as well as technology and humanity.<ref>Latour, Bruno (1987). Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society. Hardward University Press. ISBN 0674792912.</ref>

	==References==		==References==

Caseorganic at 00:59, 6 November 2011

2011-11-06T00:59:21Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:59, 6 November 2011
Line 1:		Line 1:
	===Definition===		===Definition===
	Technoscience ~~was~~ a term coined by Belgian philosopher Gilbert Hottois<ref>Hottois, Gilbert (1984). Le signe et la technique. La philosophie à l’épreuve de la technique, Paris, Aubier Montaigne, Coll. «Res - L’invention philosophique», p.59-60.</ref> in the late 1970s. It has been applied by sociologist Bruno Latour to study scientists and engineers in society, as well as technology and humanity.<ref>Latour, Bruno (1987). Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society. Hardward University Press. ISBN 0674792912.</ref>		Technoscience is a term coined by Belgian philosopher Gilbert Hottois<ref>Hottois, Gilbert (1984). Le signe et la technique. La philosophie à l’épreuve de la technique, Paris, Aubier Montaigne, Coll. «Res - L’invention philosophique», p.59-60.</ref> in the late 1970s. It has been applied by sociologist Bruno Latour to study scientists and engineers in society, as well as technology and humanity.<ref>Latour, Bruno (1987). Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society. Hardward University Press. ISBN 0674792912.</ref>

	Technoscience suggests that science and technology are relational, rather than two separate elements. Instead of being seperate, Hottois and Latour argue that science is always enabled by technology, and technology and science are co-produced. The notion indicates a common recognition that scientific knowledge is not only socially coded and historically situated but sustained and made durable by material (non-human) networks.		Technoscience suggests that science and technology are relational, rather than two separate elements. Instead of being seperate, Hottois and Latour argue that science is always enabled by technology, and technology and science are co-produced. The notion indicates a common recognition that scientific knowledge is not only socially coded and historically situated but sustained and made durable by material (non-human) networks.

Caseorganic at 00:57, 6 November 2011

2011-11-06T00:57:16Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:57, 6 November 2011
Line 7:		Line 7:
	<references />		<references />

	[[Category:~~Finished~~]]		[[Category:Marked for Editing]]
	[[Category:Book Pages]]		[[Category:Book Pages]]

Caseorganic at 00:56, 6 November 2011

2011-11-06T00:56:59Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:56, 6 November 2011
Line 1:		Line 1:
	===Definition===		===Definition===
	~~The~~ term ~~technoscience comes from~~ the ~~work of~~ Latour<ref>Latour, Bruno (1987). Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society. Hardward University Press. ISBN 0674792912</ref>		Technoscience was a term coined by Belgian philosopher Gilbert Hottois<ref>Hottois, Gilbert (1984). Le signe et la technique. La philosophie à l’épreuve de la technique, Paris, Aubier Montaigne, Coll. «Res - L’invention philosophique», p.59-60.</ref> in the late 1970s. It has been applied by sociologist Bruno Latour to study scientists and engineers in society, as well as technology and humanity.<ref>Latour, Bruno (1987). Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society. Hardward University Press. ISBN 0674792912.</ref>

	~~Science~~ and technology are ~~relation~~, rather than two separate elements ~~you would not think~~ of ~~them as~~ being ~~different~~		Technoscience suggests that science and technology are relational, rather than two separate elements. Instead of being seperate, Hottois and Latour argue that science is always enabled by technology, and technology and science are co-produced. The notion indicates a common recognition that scientific knowledge is not only socially coded and historically situated but sustained and made durable by material (non-human) networks.

	~~Science~~ is always enabled by technology, and technology and science are co-produced.

	(The notion indicates a common recognition that scientific knowledge is not only socially coded and historically situated but sustained and made durable by material (non-human) networks. "Technoscience" is a term coined by Belgian philosopher Gilbert Hottois<ref>Hottois, Gilbert (1984). Le signe et la technique. La philosophie à l’épreuve de la technique, Paris, Aubier Montaigne, Coll. «Res - L’invention philosophique», p.59-60.</ref> in the late 1970s.) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technoscience

	==References==		==References==
	<references />		<references />

	[[Category:~~Unfinished~~]]		[[Category:Finished]]
	[[Category:Book Pages]]		[[Category:Book Pages]]

Caseorganic at 17:40, 5 November 2011

2011-11-05T17:40:00Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:40, 5 November 2011
Line 1:		Line 1:
	===Definition===		===Definition===
	The term technoscience comes from the work of Latour		The term technoscience comes from the work of Latour<ref>Latour, Bruno (1987). Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society. Hardward University Press. ISBN 0674792912</ref>

	Science and technology are relation, rather than two separate elements you would not think of them as being different		Science and technology are relation, rather than two separate elements you would not think of them as being different

	Science is always enabled by technology, and technology and science are co-produced.		Science is always enabled by technology, and technology and science are co-produced.

			(The notion indicates a common recognition that scientific knowledge is not only socially coded and historically situated but sustained and made durable by material (non-human) networks. "Technoscience" is a term coined by Belgian philosopher Gilbert Hottois<ref>Hottois, Gilbert (1984). Le signe et la technique. La philosophie à l’épreuve de la technique, Paris, Aubier Montaigne, Coll. «Res - L’invention philosophique», p.59-60.</ref> in the late 1970s.) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technoscience

			==References==
			<references />

	[[Category:Unfinished]]		[[Category:Unfinished]]
	[[Category:Book Pages]]		[[Category:Book Pages]]

Caseorganic: Created page with "===Definition=== The term technoscience comes from the work of Latour Science and technology are relation, rather than two separate elements you would not think of them as being..."

2011-11-05T17:31:56Z

Created page with "===Definition=== The term technoscience comes from the work of Latour Science and technology are relation, rather than two separate elements you would not think of them as being..."

New page

===Definition===
The term technoscience comes from the work of Latour

Science and technology are relation, rather than two separate elements you would not think of them as being different

Science is always enabled by technology, and technology and science are co-produced.

[[Category:Unfinished]]
[[Category:Book Pages]]