Mundane Science Fiction - Revision history

Caseorganic at 23:53, 7 August 2012

2012-08-07T23:53:57Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:53, 7 August 2012
Line 30:		Line 30:
	[[Category:Book Pages]]		[[Category:Book Pages]]
	[[Category:Finished]]		[[Category:Finished]]
			[[Category:Illustrated V2]]

	__NOTOC__		__NOTOC__

Caseorganic at 04:06, 28 December 2011

2011-12-28T04:06:58Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:06, 28 December 2011
Line 29:		Line 29:

	[[Category:Book Pages]]		[[Category:Book Pages]]
	[[Category:~~Marked for Editing~~]]		[[Category:Finished]]

	__NOTOC__		__NOTOC__

Caseorganic at 17:02, 15 November 2011

2011-11-15T17:02:14Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:02, 15 November 2011
Line 1:		Line 1:
	===~~Summary~~===		===Definition===
	'''Mundane Science Fiction''' is the ideology that much of science fiction is too fantasy-driven to be useful to the development of ideas and thought, and that the field itself cripples itself when serious sociological topics are intermixed with stories of aliens, faster than light travel and other repeating tropes. Examples of mundane science fiction include Orwell's 1984, as his work was a way of exploring politics without political repercussion that political commentary would entail. Much of mundane science fiction is a way of exploring systems and futures without actually creating them.		'''Mundane Science Fiction''' is the ideology that much of science fiction is too fantasy-driven to be useful to the development of ideas and thought, and that the field itself cripples itself when serious sociological topics are intermixed with stories of aliens, faster than light travel and other repeating tropes. Examples of mundane science fiction include Orwell's 1984, as his work was a way of exploring politics without political repercussion that political commentary would entail. Much of mundane science fiction is a way of exploring systems and futures without actually creating them.

	===Definition===		===Definition===
	"Mundane-SF is set in the near future (let’s say the next fifty years), and uses believable technology based on current science" <ref>[http://www.everydayfiction.com/flashfictionblog/mundane-science-fiction-taking-all-the-razzle-dazzle-out-of-the-future-2/ ~~Flash Fiction Blog:~~ Mundane ~~Science Fiction - Taking all~~ the ~~Razzle Dazzle out~~ of ~~the Future 2]~~</ref>.		"Mundane-SF is set in the near future (let’s say the next fifty years), and uses believable technology based on current science" <ref>Flash Fiction Blog: Mundane Science Fiction - Taking all the Razzle Dazzle out of the Future 2 Accessed Oct 2010. http://www.everydayfiction.com/flashfictionblog/mundane-science-fiction-taking-all-the-razzle-dazzle-out-of-the-future-2/ </ref>. "The Mundane SF manifesto was inspired by the ideas of Julian Todd and Trent Walters and founded by Geoff Ryman and others, during Clarion 2002".<ref>Ibid. Clarion is a prestigious American residential workshop programme for speculative fiction writers.</ref>

	~~===History===~~		<blockquote>In 2000, sociologist Wayne Brekhus published "A Mundane Manifesto," in which argued that "...the extraordinary draws disproportionate theoretical attention from researchers," and that this "ultimately hinders theory development and distorts our picture of social reality". A Mundane Manifesto paved the way for an explicit social science of the unmarked (mundane). Finally, he suggests, "Although there are many deviance journals to explicitly analyze socially unusual behavior there is no Journal of Mundane Behavior to explicitly analyze conformity" <ref>“Mundane SF 101,” SFRA Review 289 (Summer 2009): 13–16. http://www.sfra.org/sfra-review/289.pdf Accessed Oct 2010.</ref>.</blockquote>
	"~~The~~ Mundane ~~SF manifesto was inspired by~~ the ~~ideas of Julian Todd~~ and ~~Trent Walters~~ and ~~founded by Geoff Ryman and others~~, ~~during Clarion 2002 (Clarion~~ is ~~a prestigious American residential workshop programme for speculative fiction writers)~~" <ref>~~Ibid~~.</ref>

	~~<blockquote>"In 2000, sociologist Wayne Brekhus published "A Mundane Manifesto," in which~~ he "calls for analytically interesting studies of the socially uninteresting." Brekhus continues, "I argue that the extraordinary draws disproportionate theoretical attention from researchers. This ultimately hinders theory development and distorts our picture of social reality. This manifesto paves the way for an explicit social science of the unmarked (mundane). It is hoped that a similar manifesto can be written for the humanities." Finally, he suggests, "Although there are many deviance journals to explicitly analyze socially unusual behavior there is no Journal of Mundane Behavior to explicitly analyze conformity" <ref>[http://www.sfra.org/sfra-review/289.pdf “Mundane SF 101,” SFRA Review 289 (Summer 2009): 13–16.]</ref>.</blockquote>		Science fiction writer Geoff Ryman wrote that he felt that "much of regular science fiction being based on an 'adolescent desire to run away from our world', noting that humans are not truly considered grown-up until they "create a new home of their own," which is what mundane science fiction aims to do"<ref>"Take the Third Star on the Left and on til Morning" by Geoff Ryman, New York Review of Science Fiction, June 2007.</ref>

	~~"Geoff Ryman has contrasted mundane science fiction with regular science fiction through the desire of teenagers to leave their parents' homes.<ref>"Take the Third Star on the Left and on til Morning~~" ~~by Geoff Ryman, New York Review of Science Fiction, June 2007.</ref> Ryman sees too~~ much of regular science fiction being based on an "adolescent desire to run away from our world~~." However~~, ~~Ryman notes~~ that humans are not truly considered grown-up until they "create a new home of their own," which is what mundane science fiction aims to do" <ref>"Take the Third Star on the Left and on til Morning" by Geoff Ryman, New York Review of Science Fiction, June 2007.</ref>~~<ref>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mundane_science_fiction</ref>.~~

	===Mundane Science Fiction Manifesto===		===Mundane Science Fiction Manifesto===
	"The Mundane Manifesto" was originally posted online, ~~though it, contrary to all common wisdom about information made available on the Web, seems to have completely disappeared from cyberspace; only fragments of it remain"~~ <ref>[http://www.sfra.org/sfra-review/289.pdf ~~“Mundane SF 101,” SFRA Review 289 (Summer 2009): 13–16.]~~</ref>		"The Mundane Manifesto" was originally posted online,<ref>Calvin, Ritch. What Is Mundane Science Fiction? “Mundane SF 101,” SFRA Review 289 (Summer 2009): 13–16. http://www.sfra.org/sfra-review/289.pdf</ref> and contains "nine statements, that many of the familiar tropes, techniques, and technologies of science fiction are unrealistic, and therefore, should be avoided. The mundanes hold that faster-than-light travel, hospitable planets, intelligent aliens, interstellar trade, communication with alien species, and alternate universes all remain too far-fetched, too unrealistic to be of interest. Furthermore, the belief in, advocacy of, and employment of these devices lead us to turn away from—to escape from—the importance and immediacy of crises here on planet Earth. As they conclude, "the most likely future is one in which we only have ourselves and this planet".<ref>Chiang, Ted. “Is Air Mundane?” Extrapolation 49.2 (Summer 2009): 211–13.</ref> Although "mundane" is often taken to mean "banal" or "ordinary," it also denotes "of the world".<ref>Ibid.</ref>. Part 2 of the 'Mundane Science Fiction Manifesto includes a 'list of "Stupidities' that have been created due to the improbabilities committed in part 1. The Stupidities include "alien invasions," "flying saucers," "devices that can translate any language," and slipping into alternate realities that differ from our own by small degrees".<ref>Ibid.</ref>, and Part 3 "...acknowledges that the Stupidities have entertained and delighted many millions of readers and viewers; however, the mundanes assert that the destruction of those same Stupidities will be equally entertaining. Furthermore, they offer an "imaginative challenge" to science fiction authors to work from the standpoint that "Earth is all we have" (5). They contend that the (re)turn to the here and now will compel writers and readers to (re)awaken to the wonder and diversity of the Earth and to the dangers it currently faces. Lest the writer or reader think that such a move would eliminate the science from "science fiction," they argue that "robotics, virtual realities, enhanced genomes, nanotechnology, quantum mechanics" are all fertile grounds for mundane SF. Finally, part 4 sets out a number of "promises" by the mundanes. In these promises, they vow to create "a collection of mundane science fiction" that does not commit the "Stupidities" of science fiction, but to also have the freedom to write (stupid) science fiction, if they should choose to".<ref>Ibid.</ref>.

	~~====Part 1====~~
	~~Contains~~ "nine statements, that many of the familiar tropes, techniques, and technologies of science fiction are unrealistic, and therefore, should be avoided. The mundanes hold that faster-than-light travel, hospitable planets, intelligent aliens, interstellar trade, communication with alien species, and alternate universes all remain too far-fetched, too unrealistic to be of interest. Furthermore, the belief in, advocacy of, and employment of these devices lead us to turn away from—to escape from—the importance and immediacy of crises here on planet Earth. As they conclude, "the most likely future is one in which we only have ourselves and this planet" (4). Although "mundane" is often taken to mean "banal" or "ordinary," it also denotes "of the world" ~~(Ryman, "Geoff"; Kelly)" "~~ <ref>Ibid.</ref>.

	~~====~~Part 2~~====~~
	"A list of "Stupidities" that have been created due to the improbabilities committed in part 1. The Stupidities include "alien invasions," "flying saucers," "devices that can translate any language," and slipping into alternate realities that differ from our own by small degrees" " <ref>Ibid.</ref>.

	~~====~~Part 3~~====~~
	"...acknowledges that the Stupidities have entertained and delighted many millions of readers and viewers; however, the mundanes assert that the destruction of those same Stupidities will be equally entertaining. Furthermore, they offer an "imaginative challenge" to science fiction authors to work from the standpoint that "Earth is all we have" (5). They contend that the (re)turn to the here and now will compel writers and readers to (re)awaken to the wonder and diversity of the Earth and to the dangers it currently faces. Lest the writer or reader think that such a move would eliminate the science from "science fiction," they argue that "robotics, virtual realities, enhanced genomes, nanotechnology, quantum mechanics" are all fertile grounds for mundane SF. Finally, part 4 sets out a number of "promises" by the mundanes. In these promises, they vow to create "a collection of mundane science fiction" that does not commit the "Stupidities" of science fiction, but to also have the freedom to write (stupid) science fiction, if they should choose to" " <ref>Ibid.</ref>.

	~~===Mundane Science Fiction as Simulation===~~
	Science fiction is a powerful tool for exploring ethical dilemmas and simulated humanistic experiences without fear of exploitation, violations of human rights and the borders of ethical boundaries. Science fiction such as [[Star Trek]], George Orwell, Ray Bradbury and [[Bruce Sterling]] take the user into mental experiments whereby a set of simulations is present, allowing the reader to understand and immerse themselves in an ethical dilemma in a way that would be impossible in real life.

	===Related Reading===		===Related Reading===

Caseorganic at 16:47, 13 September 2011

2011-09-13T16:47:17Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:47, 13 September 2011
Line 1:		Line 1:
	===Summary===		===Summary===
	'''Mundane Science Fiction''' is the ideology that much of science fiction is too fantasy-driven to be useful to the development of ideas and thought, and that the field itself cripples itself when serious sociological topics are intermixed with stories of aliens, faster than light travel and other repeating tropes. Examples of mundane science fiction include Orwell's 1984, as his work was a way of exploring politics without political repercussion that political commentary would entail. Much of mundane science fiction is a way of exploring systems and futures.		'''Mundane Science Fiction''' is the ideology that much of science fiction is too fantasy-driven to be useful to the development of ideas and thought, and that the field itself cripples itself when serious sociological topics are intermixed with stories of aliens, faster than light travel and other repeating tropes. Examples of mundane science fiction include Orwell's 1984, as his work was a way of exploring politics without political repercussion that political commentary would entail. Much of mundane science fiction is a way of exploring systems and futures without actually creating them.

	===Definition===		===Definition===

Caseorganic at 20:34, 3 June 2011

2011-06-03T20:34:31Z

@@ Line 23: / Line 23: @@
 ====Part 3====
 "...acknowledges that the Stupidities have entertained and delighted many millions of readers and viewers; however, the mundanes assert that the destruction of those same Stupidities will be equally entertaining. Furthermore, they offer an "imaginative challenge" to science fiction authors to work from the standpoint that "Earth is all we have" (5). They contend that the (re)turn to the here and now will compel writers and readers to (re)awaken to the wonder and diversity of the Earth and to the dangers it currently faces. Lest the writer or reader think that such a move would eliminate the science from "science fiction," they argue that "robotics, virtual realities, enhanced genomes, nanotechnology, quantum mechanics" are all fertile grounds for mundane SF. Finally, part 4 sets out a number of "promises" by the mundanes. In these promises, they vow to create "a collection of mundane science fiction" that does not commit the "Stupidities" of science fiction, but to also have the freedom to write (stupid) science fiction, if they should choose to" " <ref>Ibid.</ref>.
 ===External Links===
@@ Line 31: / Line 39: @@
 *[http://gerrycanavan.wordpress.com/2010/09/13/science-justice-science-fiction-an-interview-with-kim-stanley-robinson/ Science, Justice, Science Fiction: An Interview with Kim Stanley Robinson] by Gerry Canavan
 *[http://www.metanexus.net/magazine/tabid/68/id/10543/Default.aspx Wrestling with Transhumanism by Katherine Hayles]
 == References ==

Caseorganic at 20:32, 3 June 2011

2011-06-03T20:32:35Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:32, 3 June 2011
Line 31:		Line 31:
	*[http://gerrycanavan.wordpress.com/2010/09/13/science-justice-science-fiction-an-interview-with-kim-stanley-robinson/ Science, Justice, Science Fiction: An Interview with Kim Stanley Robinson] by Gerry Canavan		*[http://gerrycanavan.wordpress.com/2010/09/13/science-justice-science-fiction-an-interview-with-kim-stanley-robinson/ Science, Justice, Science Fiction: An Interview with Kim Stanley Robinson] by Gerry Canavan
	*[http://www.metanexus.net/magazine/tabid/68/id/10543/Default.aspx Wrestling with Transhumanism by Katherine Hayles]		*[http://www.metanexus.net/magazine/tabid/68/id/10543/Default.aspx Wrestling with Transhumanism by Katherine Hayles]

			===Mundane Science Fiction as Simulation===
			Science fiction is a powerful tool for exploring ethical dilemmas and simulated humanistic experiences without fear of exploitation, violations of human rights and the borders of ethical boundaries. Science fiction such as [[Star Trek]], George Orwell, Ray Bradbury and [[Bruce Sterling]] take the user into mental experiments whereby a set of simulations is present, allowing the reader to understand and immerse themselves in an ethical dilemma in a way that would be impossible in real life.


	===Related Reading===		===Related Reading===
	*[[Mundane Studies]]		*[[Mundane Studies]]
	*[[Science Fiction and Ethics]]		*[[Science Fiction and Ethics]]
			*[http://inside.fdu.edu/fdupress/03100201.html Future Present: Ethics and/as Science Fiction by Michael Pinsky]

	== References ==		== References ==
	<references />		<references />


	[[Category:Book Pages]]		[[Category:Book Pages]]

Caseorganic at 00:53, 26 April 2011

2011-04-26T00:53:10Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:53, 26 April 2011
Line 1:		Line 1:
			===Summary===
			'''Mundane Science Fiction''' is the ideology that much of science fiction is too fantasy-driven to be useful to the development of ideas and thought, and that the field itself cripples itself when serious sociological topics are intermixed with stories of aliens, faster than light travel and other repeating tropes. Examples of mundane science fiction include Orwell's 1984, as his work was a way of exploring politics without political repercussion that political commentary would entail. Much of mundane science fiction is a way of exploring systems and futures.

	===Definition===		===Definition===
	The ideology that much of science fiction is too "out there" to be useful to the development of ideas and thought, and that the field itself cripples itself when the same science fiction stories about aliens, faster than light travel and other repeating tropes occur again and again. Instead, stories of mundane life in alternate systems are more valuable for exploring different ideas, and are often more successful and interesting as narratives. Harry Potter could be considered to be in the category of mundane science fiction.

	"Mundane-SF is set in the near future (let’s say the next fifty years), and uses believable technology based on current science" <ref>[http://www.everydayfiction.com/flashfictionblog/mundane-science-fiction-taking-all-the-razzle-dazzle-out-of-the-future-2/ Flash Fiction Blog: Mundane Science Fiction - Taking all the Razzle Dazzle out of the Future 2]</ref>.		"Mundane-SF is set in the near future (let’s say the next fifty years), and uses believable technology based on current science" <ref>[http://www.everydayfiction.com/flashfictionblog/mundane-science-fiction-taking-all-the-razzle-dazzle-out-of-the-future-2/ Flash Fiction Blog: Mundane Science Fiction - Taking all the Razzle Dazzle out of the Future 2]</ref>.

Caseorganic at 00:46, 26 April 2011

2011-04-26T00:46:53Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:46, 26 April 2011
Line 29:		Line 29:
	*[http://www.mikebrotherton.com/2008/01/25/the-difference-between-hard-science-fiction-and-mundane-science-fiction/ The Difference Between Hard Science Fiction and Mundane Science Fiction] by Mike Brotherton, January 25th, 2008.		*[http://www.mikebrotherton.com/2008/01/25/the-difference-between-hard-science-fiction-and-mundane-science-fiction/ The Difference Between Hard Science Fiction and Mundane Science Fiction] by Mike Brotherton, January 25th, 2008.
	*[http://gerrycanavan.wordpress.com/2010/09/13/science-justice-science-fiction-an-interview-with-kim-stanley-robinson/ Science, Justice, Science Fiction: An Interview with Kim Stanley Robinson] by Gerry Canavan		*[http://gerrycanavan.wordpress.com/2010/09/13/science-justice-science-fiction-an-interview-with-kim-stanley-robinson/ Science, Justice, Science Fiction: An Interview with Kim Stanley Robinson] by Gerry Canavan
			*[http://www.metanexus.net/magazine/tabid/68/id/10543/Default.aspx Wrestling with Transhumanism by Katherine Hayles]

	===Related Reading===		===Related Reading===

Caseorganic at 15:12, 29 March 2011

2011-03-29T15:12:08Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:12, 29 March 2011
Line 32:		Line 32:
	===Related Reading===		===Related Reading===
	*[[Mundane Studies]]		*[[Mundane Studies]]
			*[[Science Fiction and Ethics]]

	== References ==		== References ==

Caseorganic at 05:10, 14 February 2011

2011-02-14T05:10:44Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:10, 14 February 2011
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~{{permission}}~~
	===Definition===		===Definition===
	The ideology that much of science fiction is too "out there" to be useful to the development of ideas and thought, and that the field itself cripples itself when the same science fiction stories about aliens, faster than light travel and other repeating tropes occur again and again. Instead, stories of mundane life in alternate systems are more valuable for exploring different ideas, and are often more successful and interesting as narratives. Harry Potter could be considered to be in the category of mundane science fiction.		The ideology that much of science fiction is too "out there" to be useful to the development of ideas and thought, and that the field itself cripples itself when the same science fiction stories about aliens, faster than light travel and other repeating tropes occur again and again. Instead, stories of mundane life in alternate systems are more valuable for exploring different ideas, and are often more successful and interesting as narratives. Harry Potter could be considered to be in the category of mundane science fiction.