<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://cyborganthropology.com/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Intimations_of_Everyday_Life</id>
	<title>Intimations of Everyday Life - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://cyborganthropology.com/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Intimations_of_Everyday_Life"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://cyborganthropology.com/index.php?title=Intimations_of_Everyday_Life&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-08-26T03:02:51Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.46.0</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://cyborganthropology.com/index.php?title=Intimations_of_Everyday_Life&amp;diff=7296&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Caseorganic: Created page with &quot;===Author=== Anne Galloway, a Canadian sociologist and design researcher, now at Victoria University of Wellington. She wrote this article while a doctoral student at Carleton University, working at the intersection of science and technology studies, urban sociology and ubiquitous computing.  ===Citation=== Galloway, Anne. &quot;Intimations of everyday life: Ubiquitous computing and the city.&quot; &#039;&#039;Cultural Studies&#039;&#039; 18, nos. 2–3 (2004): 384–408.&lt;ref&gt;[https://www.tandfonline...&quot;</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://cyborganthropology.com/index.php?title=Intimations_of_Everyday_Life&amp;diff=7296&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2026-08-25T17:19:28Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Created page with &amp;quot;===Author=== Anne Galloway, a Canadian sociologist and design researcher, now at Victoria University of Wellington. She wrote this article while a doctoral student at Carleton University, working at the intersection of science and technology studies, urban sociology and ubiquitous computing.  ===Citation=== Galloway, Anne. &amp;quot;Intimations of everyday life: Ubiquitous computing and the city.&amp;quot; &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Cultural Studies&amp;#039;&amp;#039; 18, nos. 2–3 (2004): 384–408.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.tandfonline...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;===Author===&lt;br /&gt;
Anne Galloway, a Canadian sociologist and design researcher, now at Victoria University of Wellington. She wrote this article while a doctoral student at Carleton University, working at the intersection of science and technology studies, urban sociology and ubiquitous computing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Citation===&lt;br /&gt;
Galloway, Anne. &amp;quot;Intimations of everyday life: Ubiquitous computing and the city.&amp;quot; &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Cultural Studies&amp;#039;&amp;#039; 18, nos. 2–3 (2004): 384–408.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/0950238042000201572 Intimations of everyday life: Ubiquitous computing and the city], &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Cultural Studies&amp;#039;&amp;#039;.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Description===&lt;br /&gt;
The article was among the first pieces of cultural-studies scholarship to take ubiquitous computing seriously as an urban rather than a technical development, and it did so before the field had a name outside computer science.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Galloway&amp;#039;s argument proceeds by putting two literatures together that had not been in contact. From computing, Mark Weiser&amp;#039;s programme at [[PARC Research|PARC]] and the emerging work on context-awareness, pervasive computing and locative media. From social theory, [[Henri Lefebvre|Lefebvre&amp;#039;s]] critique of everyday life and production of space, Michel de Certeau on tactics and walking in the city, and the Situationist practices of &amp;#039;&amp;#039;dérive&amp;#039;&amp;#039; and psychogeography.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Her central move is to insist that ubiquitous computing is a project about &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;everyday life&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; — that is its explicit ambition — and that everyday life is precisely what Lefebvre and de Certeau identified as the site where power operates and is resisted. This means ubicomp cannot be evaluated as a technical programme. To embed computation in the routines of a city is to intervene in the production of urban space, whether or not the engineers involved understand it that way.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Key Ideas===&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Ubicomp as spatial production.&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; Following Lefebvre: an instrumented street is a differently produced space, not the same street with added services. See [[The Production of Space|&amp;#039;&amp;#039;The Production of Space&amp;#039;&amp;#039;]].&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Tactics against strategies.&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; De Certeau&amp;#039;s distinction, applied to pervasive systems. Institutions deploy strategies from a fixed position of power; users improvise tactics within them. Galloway&amp;#039;s interest is in the tactical — the appropriations, misuses and workarounds that pervasive systems do not anticipate.&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Everyday life is not residual.&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; The routine, unremarkable and habitual is where technology becomes consequential, because that is where it stops being noticed.&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;The politics of seamlessness.&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; A system designed to disappear is a system that cannot be inspected, contested or refused. Galloway&amp;#039;s argument here anticipates Mark Weiser&amp;#039;s own later ambivalence and the &amp;quot;seamful design&amp;quot; position developed by Matthew Chalmers and others.&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Playful and artistic practice as research.&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; Her sustained attention to locative art and urban games as legitimate investigations of the same questions, rather than as diversions from them.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Relevance to Cyborg Anthropology===&lt;br /&gt;
This article is the bridge between critical urban theory and ubiquitous computing, and it was built early. Its lasting contribution is the insistence that a technology whose stated goal is to become invisible has thereby made a political choice, and that the design literature&amp;#039;s vocabulary of &amp;quot;seamlessness&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;calm&amp;quot; needs to be read alongside a literature that has been studying the politics of the taken-for-granted for fifty years. Compare [[Everyware: The Dawning Age of Ubiquitous Computing|&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Everyware&amp;#039;&amp;#039;]], which reaches similar conclusions from the design side two years later.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Related Reading===&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Everyware: The Dawning Age of Ubiquitous Computing]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Henri Lefebvre]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[The Production of Space]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Calm Technology]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[PARC Research]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Beyond Locative Media]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===References===&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Articles]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Time and Space]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Information Society]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Caseorganic</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>