Ambient Awareness - Revision history

Caseorganic at 05:25, 8 August 2012

2012-08-08T05:25:46Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:25, 8 August 2012
Line 14:		Line 14:

	What we're really seeing is that everything is a button away. We are mobile, and we need just-in-time information. In our mothers' wombs, all things came to us without us having to go anywhere. It is the same with the smartphone. Even though we move around in time and space, we can increasingly access social and entertainment sentience via a single device. Our devices and surroundings have become a sort of technosocial womb. Facebook's algorithm strives to keep information displayed relevant, and, if not relevant, interesting enough to browse through and click on. Twitter basically sets new users as default "socially opted out" until they gather content to follow. When they encounter something they don't like, they're free to drop them.		What we're really seeing is that everything is a button away. We are mobile, and we need just-in-time information. In our mothers' wombs, all things came to us without us having to go anywhere. It is the same with the smartphone. Even though we move around in time and space, we can increasingly access social and entertainment sentience via a single device. Our devices and surroundings have become a sort of technosocial womb. Facebook's algorithm strives to keep information displayed relevant, and, if not relevant, interesting enough to browse through and click on. Twitter basically sets new users as default "socially opted out" until they gather content to follow. When they encounter something they don't like, they're free to drop them.

	For Leisa, these online social interactions are not the social equivalent of junk food. There are others who disagree. Anyone who has seen someone compulsively check an activity stream of information on their phone has a right to feel that these streams can become addicting. And rightly so, ambient intimacy is not a replacement for real-life interaction. It is more of an atmospheric communication, a set of small moments that are not intended to receive full attention: moments in the periphery. It is only when these peripheral moments become excessive and primary that they become digital junk food.

	The promise of fast food is that it requires minimal effort and time to order, receive and consume. What Reichelt noted was that humans were "expending almost no energy at all on getting to grips with this info, it's just there to take it all in if we want". <ref>Leisa Reichelt. Posted by Suw Charman-Anderson. Published Oct 2007. Accessed Oct 2011. http://strange.corante.com/2007/10/04/fowa07b-leisa-reichelt</ref> Humans have stomachs that tell them when they are full, but the human brain did not evolve with that feeling. One must be mindful of intake and the effect it has on one's mental processes.

	~~===Related Reading===~~
	*[[Intermittent Reinforcement]]

	==References==		==References==

Caseorganic at 04:51, 28 December 2011

2011-12-28T04:51:53Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:51, 28 December 2011
Line 18:		Line 18:

	The promise of fast food is that it requires minimal effort and time to order, receive and consume. What Reichelt noted was that humans were "expending almost no energy at all on getting to grips with this info, it's just there to take it all in if we want". <ref>Leisa Reichelt. Posted by Suw Charman-Anderson. Published Oct 2007. Accessed Oct 2011. http://strange.corante.com/2007/10/04/fowa07b-leisa-reichelt</ref> Humans have stomachs that tell them when they are full, but the human brain did not evolve with that feeling. One must be mindful of intake and the effect it has on one's mental processes.		The promise of fast food is that it requires minimal effort and time to order, receive and consume. What Reichelt noted was that humans were "expending almost no energy at all on getting to grips with this info, it's just there to take it all in if we want". <ref>Leisa Reichelt. Posted by Suw Charman-Anderson. Published Oct 2007. Accessed Oct 2011. http://strange.corante.com/2007/10/04/fowa07b-leisa-reichelt</ref> Humans have stomachs that tell them when they are full, but the human brain did not evolve with that feeling. One must be mindful of intake and the effect it has on one's mental processes.

			===Related Reading===
			*[[Intermittent Reinforcement]]

	==References==		==References==

Caseorganic at 04:50, 28 December 2011

2011-12-28T04:50:53Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:50, 28 December 2011
Line 10:		Line 10:
	Alex Soojung-Kim Pang wrote that "Each little update — each individual bit of social information — is insignificant on its own, even supremely mundane. But taken together, over time, the little snippets coalesce into a surprisingly sophisticated portrait of your friends' and family members' lives, like thousands of dots making a pointillist painting. This was never before possible, because in the real world, no friend would bother to call you up and detail the sandwiches she was eating. The ambient information becomes like "a type of E.S.P.," as Haley described it to me, an invisible dimension floating over everyday life...".<ref>Thompson, Clive. Brave New World of Digital Intimacy. New York Times. Published 7. Sept. 2008. Accessed 07 Apr. 2011. http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/07/magazine/07awareness-t.html</ref>		Alex Soojung-Kim Pang wrote that "Each little update — each individual bit of social information — is insignificant on its own, even supremely mundane. But taken together, over time, the little snippets coalesce into a surprisingly sophisticated portrait of your friends' and family members' lives, like thousands of dots making a pointillist painting. This was never before possible, because in the real world, no friend would bother to call you up and detail the sandwiches she was eating. The ambient information becomes like "a type of E.S.P.," as Haley described it to me, an invisible dimension floating over everyday life...".<ref>Thompson, Clive. Brave New World of Digital Intimacy. New York Times. Published 7. Sept. 2008. Accessed 07 Apr. 2011. http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/07/magazine/07awareness-t.html</ref>

	The paradox and allure of ambient awareness lies in its shape. It's not that we're always connected, but that we have always ability to connect. This is ambient intimacy, where connectivity is only a button away. Where sharing and connecting with another is not defined by geography but technosocial capability. David Weinberger called it "continual partial friendship", and Johnnie Moore pointed out that, "it's not about being poked and prodded, it's about exposing more surface area for others to connect with". Reality theorist [[Sheldon Renan]] calls it "Loosely but deeply entangled". Whatever you call it, it is a higher order of connectivity than we've ever experienced before as humans. We are beginning to see a new sense of time - the collective now.		===Ambient Intimacy===
			The paradox and allure of ambient awareness lies in its shape. It's not that we're always connected, but that we have always ability to connect. This what Leisa Reichelt calls ambient intimacy, where connectivity is only a button away. Where sharing and connecting with another is not defined by geography but technosocial capability. David Weinberger called it "continual partial friendship", and Johnnie Moore pointed out that, "it's not about being poked and prodded, it's about exposing more surface area for others to connect with". Reality theorist [[Sheldon Renan]] calls it "Loosely but deeply entangled". Whatever you call it, it is a higher order of connectivity than we've ever experienced before as humans. We are beginning to see a new sense of time - the collective now.

	What we're really seeing is that everything is a button away. We are mobile, and we need just-in-time information. In our mothers' wombs, all things came to us without us having to go anywhere. It is the same with the smartphone. Even though we move around in time and space, we can increasingly access social and entertainment sentience via a single device. Our devices and surroundings have become a sort of technosocial womb. Facebook's algorithm strives to keep information displayed relevant, and, if not relevant, interesting enough to browse through and click on. Twitter basically sets new users as default "socially opted out" until they gather content to follow. When they encounter something they don't like, they're free to drop them.		What we're really seeing is that everything is a button away. We are mobile, and we need just-in-time information. In our mothers' wombs, all things came to us without us having to go anywhere. It is the same with the smartphone. Even though we move around in time and space, we can increasingly access social and entertainment sentience via a single device. Our devices and surroundings have become a sort of technosocial womb. Facebook's algorithm strives to keep information displayed relevant, and, if not relevant, interesting enough to browse through and click on. Twitter basically sets new users as default "socially opted out" until they gather content to follow. When they encounter something they don't like, they're free to drop them.
Line 22:		Line 23:

	[[Category:Book Pages]]		[[Category:Book Pages]]
	[[Category:~~Marked for Editing~~]]		[[Category:Finished]]
	[[Category:Illustrated]]		[[Category:Illustrated]]

	__NOTOC__		__NOTOC__

Caseorganic at 00:25, 1 December 2011

2011-12-01T00:25:24Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:25, 1 December 2011
Line 22:		Line 22:

	[[Category:Book Pages]]		[[Category:Book Pages]]
	[[Category:~~Finished~~]]		[[Category:Marked for Editing]]
	[[Category:Illustrated]]		[[Category:Illustrated]]

	__NOTOC__		__NOTOC__

Caseorganic at 23:01, 30 November 2011

2011-11-30T23:01:38Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:01, 30 November 2011
Line 8:		Line 8:
	Many social network clients have notification settings that provide pop-ups that pop over windows on a computer screen, providing a tiny window into the lives of others. One can sit at an office computer all day and still feel connected to friends, because they are being let in on the lives and happening of others bit by bit, in tiny digestible pieces, over the course of the day.		Many social network clients have notification settings that provide pop-ups that pop over windows on a computer screen, providing a tiny window into the lives of others. One can sit at an office computer all day and still feel connected to friends, because they are being let in on the lives and happening of others bit by bit, in tiny digestible pieces, over the course of the day.

	The mundanity of this informational exchange might seem off-putting at first. Indeed, that's what drove so many away from Twitter in the first place, but these pieces of information build up over time to create larger narratives and important stories. Future Alex Soojung-Kim Pang ~~writes~~ that "Each little update — each individual bit of social information — is insignificant on its own, even supremely mundane. But taken together, over time, the little snippets coalesce into a surprisingly sophisticated portrait of your friends' and family members' lives, like thousands of dots making a pointillist painting. This was never before possible, because in the real world, no friend would bother to call you up and detail the sandwiches she was eating. The ambient information becomes like "a type of E.S.P.," as Haley described it to me, an invisible dimension floating over everyday life...".<ref>Thompson, Clive. Brave New World of Digital Intimacy. New York Times. Published 7. Sept. 2008. Accessed 07 Apr. 2011. http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/07/magazine/07awareness-t.html</ref>		Alex Soojung-Kim Pang wrote that "Each little update — each individual bit of social information — is insignificant on its own, even supremely mundane. But taken together, over time, the little snippets coalesce into a surprisingly sophisticated portrait of your friends' and family members' lives, like thousands of dots making a pointillist painting. This was never before possible, because in the real world, no friend would bother to call you up and detail the sandwiches she was eating. The ambient information becomes like "a type of E.S.P.," as Haley described it to me, an invisible dimension floating over everyday life...".<ref>Thompson, Clive. Brave New World of Digital Intimacy. New York Times. Published 7. Sept. 2008. Accessed 07 Apr. 2011. http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/07/magazine/07awareness-t.html</ref>

	This "invisible dimension floating over everyday life" is the chief concern of those who create rapidly accessed and changing information technologies. Facebook's algorithm strives to keep information displayed relevant, and, if not relevant, interesting enough to browse through and click on. Twitter basically sets new users as default "socially opted out" until they gather content to follow. When they encounter something they don't like, they're free to drop them.

	The paradox and allure of ambient awareness lies in its shape. It's not that we're always connected, but that we have always ability to connect. This is ambient intimacy, where connectivity is only a button away. Where sharing and connecting with another is not defined by geography but technosocial capability. David Weinberger called it "continual partial friendship", and Johnnie Moore pointed out that, "it's not about being poked and prodded, it's about exposing more surface area for others to connect with". Reality theorist [[Sheldon Renan]] calls it "Loosely but deeply entangled". Whatever you call it, it is a higher order of connectivity than we've ever experienced before as humans. We are beginning to see a new sense of time - the collective now.		The paradox and allure of ambient awareness lies in its shape. It's not that we're always connected, but that we have always ability to connect. This is ambient intimacy, where connectivity is only a button away. Where sharing and connecting with another is not defined by geography but technosocial capability. David Weinberger called it "continual partial friendship", and Johnnie Moore pointed out that, "it's not about being poked and prodded, it's about exposing more surface area for others to connect with". Reality theorist [[Sheldon Renan]] calls it "Loosely but deeply entangled". Whatever you call it, it is a higher order of connectivity than we've ever experienced before as humans. We are beginning to see a new sense of time - the collective now.

	What we're really seeing is that everything is a button away. We are mobile, and we need just-in-time information. In our mothers' wombs, all things came to us without us having to go anywhere. It is the same with the smartphone. Even though we move around in time and space, we can increasingly access social and entertainment sentience via a single device. Our devices and surroundings have become a sort of technosocial womb.		What we're really seeing is that everything is a button away. We are mobile, and we need just-in-time information. In our mothers' wombs, all things came to us without us having to go anywhere. It is the same with the smartphone. Even though we move around in time and space, we can increasingly access social and entertainment sentience via a single device. Our devices and surroundings have become a sort of technosocial womb. Facebook's algorithm strives to keep information displayed relevant, and, if not relevant, interesting enough to browse through and click on. Twitter basically sets new users as default "socially opted out" until they gather content to follow. When they encounter something they don't like, they're free to drop them.

	For Leisa, these online social interactions are not the social equivalent of junk food. There are others who disagree. Anyone who has seen someone compulsively check an activity stream of information on their phone has a right to feel that these streams can become addicting. And rightly so, ambient intimacy is not a replacement for real-life interaction. It is more of an atmospheric communication, a set of small moments that are not intended to receive full attention: moments in the periphery. It is only when these peripheral moments become excessive and primary that they become digital junk food.		For Leisa, these online social interactions are not the social equivalent of junk food. There are others who disagree. Anyone who has seen someone compulsively check an activity stream of information on their phone has a right to feel that these streams can become addicting. And rightly so, ambient intimacy is not a replacement for real-life interaction. It is more of an atmospheric communication, a set of small moments that are not intended to receive full attention: moments in the periphery. It is only when these peripheral moments become excessive and primary that they become digital junk food.

	~~Why a junk food analogy?~~ The promise of fast food is that it requires minimal effort and time to order, receive and consume. What Reichelt noted was that humans were "expending almost no energy at all on getting to grips with this info, it's just there to take it all in if we want". <ref>Leisa Reichelt. Posted by Suw Charman-Anderson. Published Oct 2007. Accessed Oct 2011. http://strange.corante.com/2007/10/04/fowa07b-leisa-reichelt</ref> Humans have stomachs that tell them when they are full, but the human brain did not evolve with that feeling. One must be mindful of intake and the effect it has on one's mental processes.		The promise of fast food is that it requires minimal effort and time to order, receive and consume. What Reichelt noted was that humans were "expending almost no energy at all on getting to grips with this info, it's just there to take it all in if we want". <ref>Leisa Reichelt. Posted by Suw Charman-Anderson. Published Oct 2007. Accessed Oct 2011. http://strange.corante.com/2007/10/04/fowa07b-leisa-reichelt</ref> Humans have stomachs that tell them when they are full, but the human brain did not evolve with that feeling. One must be mindful of intake and the effect it has on one's mental processes.

	==References==		==References==

Caseorganic at 23:28, 26 November 2011

2011-11-26T23:28:44Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:28, 26 November 2011
Line 2:		Line 2:

	===Definition===		===Definition===
	Ambient awareness is ~~best defined by user experience designer [[Leisa Reichelt]]. One~~ of ~~her definitions is that ambient awareness~~ "~~is about being able to keep in touch with people with a level~~ of ~~regularity~~ and ~~intimacy that you wouldn't usually have access~~ to, ~~because time~~ and ~~space conspire to make it impossible."<ref>Disambiguity -- Leisa Reichelt's Professional Blog. http://www.disambiguity~~.~~com/ambient-intimacy/</ref>~~		Ambient awareness is a way of describing the idea of being "ambiently aware" of another's actions, thoughts and experiences without having to be near them physically, and without specifically requesting such information.

	Ambient awareness is ~~a way of describing the idea~~ of being ~~"ambiently aware"~~ of ~~another~~'~~s actions~~, ~~thoughts~~ and ~~experiences without having~~ to ~~be near them physically, and without specifically requesting such information~~.		Ambient awareness is best defined by user experience designer [[Leisa Reichelt]]. One of her definitions is that ambient awareness "is about being able to keep in touch with people with a level of regularity and intimacy that you wouldn't usually have access to, because time and space conspire to make it impossible."<ref>Disambiguity -- Leisa Reichelt's Professional Blog. Accessed Oct 2011. http://www.disambiguity.com/ambient-intimacy/</ref>

	Many social network clients have notification settings that provide pop-ups that pop over windows on a computer screen, providing a tiny window into the lives of others. One can sit at an office computer all day and still feel connected to friends, because they are being let in on the lives and happening of others bit by bit, in tiny digestible pieces, over the course of the day.		Many social network clients have notification settings that provide pop-ups that pop over windows on a computer screen, providing a tiny window into the lives of others. One can sit at an office computer all day and still feel connected to friends, because they are being let in on the lives and happening of others bit by bit, in tiny digestible pieces, over the course of the day.

	The mundanity of this informational exchange might seem off-putting at first. Indeed, that's what drove so many away from Twitter in the first place, but these pieces of information build up over time to create larger narratives and important stories. Future Alex Soojung-Kim Pang writes that "Each little update — each individual bit of social information — is insignificant on its own, even supremely mundane. But taken together, over time, the little snippets coalesce into a surprisingly sophisticated portrait of your friends' and family members' lives, like thousands of dots making a pointillist painting. This was never before possible, because in the real world, no friend would bother to call you up and detail the sandwiches she was eating. The ambient information becomes like "a type of E.S.P.," as Haley described it to me, an invisible dimension floating over everyday life...".<ref>Thompson, Clive. Brave New World of Digital Intimacy. New York Times. Published 7. Sept. 2008. Accessed 07 Apr. 2011. http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/07/magazine/07awareness-t.html</ref> This "invisible dimension floating over everyday life" is the chief concern of those who create rapidly accessed and changing information technologies. Facebook's algorithm strives to keep information displayed relevant, and, if not relevant, interesting enough to browse through and click on. Twitter basically sets new users as default "socially opted out" until they gather content to follow. When they encounter something they don't like, they're free to drop them.		The mundanity of this informational exchange might seem off-putting at first. Indeed, that's what drove so many away from Twitter in the first place, but these pieces of information build up over time to create larger narratives and important stories. Future Alex Soojung-Kim Pang writes that "Each little update — each individual bit of social information — is insignificant on its own, even supremely mundane. But taken together, over time, the little snippets coalesce into a surprisingly sophisticated portrait of your friends' and family members' lives, like thousands of dots making a pointillist painting. This was never before possible, because in the real world, no friend would bother to call you up and detail the sandwiches she was eating. The ambient information becomes like "a type of E.S.P.," as Haley described it to me, an invisible dimension floating over everyday life...".<ref>Thompson, Clive. Brave New World of Digital Intimacy. New York Times. Published 7. Sept. 2008. Accessed 07 Apr. 2011. http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/07/magazine/07awareness-t.html</ref>

			This "invisible dimension floating over everyday life" is the chief concern of those who create rapidly accessed and changing information technologies. Facebook's algorithm strives to keep information displayed relevant, and, if not relevant, interesting enough to browse through and click on. Twitter basically sets new users as default "socially opted out" until they gather content to follow. When they encounter something they don't like, they're free to drop them.

	The paradox and allure of ambient awareness lies in its shape. It's not that we're always connected, but that we have always ability to connect. This is ambient intimacy, where connectivity is only a button away. Where sharing and connecting with another is not defined by geography but technosocial capability. David Weinberger called it "continual partial friendship", and Johnnie Moore pointed out that, "it's not about being poked and prodded, it's about exposing more surface area for others to connect with". Reality theorist [[Sheldon Renan]] calls it "Loosely but deeply entangled". Whatever you call it, it is a higher order of connectivity than we've ever experienced before as humans. We are beginning to see a new sense of time - the collective now.		The paradox and allure of ambient awareness lies in its shape. It's not that we're always connected, but that we have always ability to connect. This is ambient intimacy, where connectivity is only a button away. Where sharing and connecting with another is not defined by geography but technosocial capability. David Weinberger called it "continual partial friendship", and Johnnie Moore pointed out that, "it's not about being poked and prodded, it's about exposing more surface area for others to connect with". Reality theorist [[Sheldon Renan]] calls it "Loosely but deeply entangled". Whatever you call it, it is a higher order of connectivity than we've ever experienced before as humans. We are beginning to see a new sense of time - the collective now.
Line 16:		Line 18:
	For Leisa, these online social interactions are not the social equivalent of junk food. There are others who disagree. Anyone who has seen someone compulsively check an activity stream of information on their phone has a right to feel that these streams can become addicting. And rightly so, ambient intimacy is not a replacement for real-life interaction. It is more of an atmospheric communication, a set of small moments that are not intended to receive full attention: moments in the periphery. It is only when these peripheral moments become excessive and primary that they become digital junk food.		For Leisa, these online social interactions are not the social equivalent of junk food. There are others who disagree. Anyone who has seen someone compulsively check an activity stream of information on their phone has a right to feel that these streams can become addicting. And rightly so, ambient intimacy is not a replacement for real-life interaction. It is more of an atmospheric communication, a set of small moments that are not intended to receive full attention: moments in the periphery. It is only when these peripheral moments become excessive and primary that they become digital junk food.

	Why a junk food analogy? The promise of fast food is that it requires minimal effort and time to order, receive and consume. What Reichelt noted was that humans were "expending almost no energy at all on getting to grips with this info, it's just there to take it all in if we want". <ref>Leisa Reichelt. Posted by Suw Charman-Anderson. Published http://strange.corante.com/2007/10/04/fowa07b-leisa-reichelt ~~FOWA07b:~~</ref> Humans have stomachs that tell them when they are full, but the human brain did not evolve with that feeling. One must be mindful of intake and the effect it has on one's mental processes.		Why a junk food analogy? The promise of fast food is that it requires minimal effort and time to order, receive and consume. What Reichelt noted was that humans were "expending almost no energy at all on getting to grips with this info, it's just there to take it all in if we want". <ref>Leisa Reichelt. Posted by Suw Charman-Anderson. Published Oct 2007. Accessed Oct 2011. http://strange.corante.com/2007/10/04/fowa07b-leisa-reichelt</ref> Humans have stomachs that tell them when they are full, but the human brain did not evolve with that feeling. One must be mindful of intake and the effect it has on one's mental processes.

	==References==		==References==

Caseorganic at 16:47, 30 September 2011

2011-09-30T16:47:04Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:47, 30 September 2011
Line 8:		Line 8:
	Many social network clients have notification settings that provide pop-ups that pop over windows on a computer screen, providing a tiny window into the lives of others. One can sit at an office computer all day and still feel connected to friends, because they are being let in on the lives and happening of others bit by bit, in tiny digestible pieces, over the course of the day.		Many social network clients have notification settings that provide pop-ups that pop over windows on a computer screen, providing a tiny window into the lives of others. One can sit at an office computer all day and still feel connected to friends, because they are being let in on the lives and happening of others bit by bit, in tiny digestible pieces, over the course of the day.

	The mundanity of this informational exchange might seem off-putting at first. Indeed, that's what drove so many away from Twitter in the first place, but these pieces of information build up over time to create larger narratives and important stories. Future Alex Soojung-Kim Pang writes that "Each little update — each individual bit of social information — is insignificant on its own, even supremely mundane. But taken together, over time, the little snippets coalesce into a surprisingly sophisticated portrait of your friends' and family members' lives, like thousands of dots making a pointillist painting. This was never before possible, because in the real world, no friend would bother to call you up and detail the sandwiches she was eating. The ambient information becomes like "a type of E.S.P.," as Haley described it to me, an invisible dimension floating over everyday life...".<ref>Brave New World of Digital Intimacy ~~(NYT)~~ http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/07/magazine/07awareness-t.html~~?_r=1~~</ref> This "invisible dimension floating over everyday life" is the chief concern of those who create rapidly accessed and changing information technologies. Facebook's algorithm strives to keep information displayed relevant, and, if not relevant, interesting enough to browse through and click on. Twitter basically sets new users as default "socially opted out" until they gather content to follow. When they encounter something they don't like, they're free to drop them.		The mundanity of this informational exchange might seem off-putting at first. Indeed, that's what drove so many away from Twitter in the first place, but these pieces of information build up over time to create larger narratives and important stories. Future Alex Soojung-Kim Pang writes that "Each little update — each individual bit of social information — is insignificant on its own, even supremely mundane. But taken together, over time, the little snippets coalesce into a surprisingly sophisticated portrait of your friends' and family members' lives, like thousands of dots making a pointillist painting. This was never before possible, because in the real world, no friend would bother to call you up and detail the sandwiches she was eating. The ambient information becomes like "a type of E.S.P.," as Haley described it to me, an invisible dimension floating over everyday life...".<ref>Thompson, Clive. Brave New World of Digital Intimacy. New York Times. Published 7. Sept. 2008. Accessed 07 Apr. 2011. http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/07/magazine/07awareness-t.html</ref> This "invisible dimension floating over everyday life" is the chief concern of those who create rapidly accessed and changing information technologies. Facebook's algorithm strives to keep information displayed relevant, and, if not relevant, interesting enough to browse through and click on. Twitter basically sets new users as default "socially opted out" until they gather content to follow. When they encounter something they don't like, they're free to drop them.

	The paradox and allure of ambient awareness lies in its shape. It's not that we're always connected, but that we have always ability to connect. This is ambient intimacy, where connectivity is only a button away. Where sharing and connecting with another is not defined by geography but technosocial capability. David Weinberger called it "continual partial friendship", and Johnnie Moore pointed out that, "it's not about being poked and prodded, it's about exposing more surface area for others to connect with". Reality theorist [[Sheldon Renan]] calls it "Loosely but deeply entangled". Whatever you call it, it is a higher order of connectivity than we've ever experienced before as humans. We are beginning to see a new sense of time - the collective now.		The paradox and allure of ambient awareness lies in its shape. It's not that we're always connected, but that we have always ability to connect. This is ambient intimacy, where connectivity is only a button away. Where sharing and connecting with another is not defined by geography but technosocial capability. David Weinberger called it "continual partial friendship", and Johnnie Moore pointed out that, "it's not about being poked and prodded, it's about exposing more surface area for others to connect with". Reality theorist [[Sheldon Renan]] calls it "Loosely but deeply entangled". Whatever you call it, it is a higher order of connectivity than we've ever experienced before as humans. We are beginning to see a new sense of time - the collective now.
Line 16:		Line 16:
	For Leisa, these online social interactions are not the social equivalent of junk food. There are others who disagree. Anyone who has seen someone compulsively check an activity stream of information on their phone has a right to feel that these streams can become addicting. And rightly so, ambient intimacy is not a replacement for real-life interaction. It is more of an atmospheric communication, a set of small moments that are not intended to receive full attention: moments in the periphery. It is only when these peripheral moments become excessive and primary that they become digital junk food.		For Leisa, these online social interactions are not the social equivalent of junk food. There are others who disagree. Anyone who has seen someone compulsively check an activity stream of information on their phone has a right to feel that these streams can become addicting. And rightly so, ambient intimacy is not a replacement for real-life interaction. It is more of an atmospheric communication, a set of small moments that are not intended to receive full attention: moments in the periphery. It is only when these peripheral moments become excessive and primary that they become digital junk food.

	Why a junk food analogy? The promise of fast food is that it requires minimal effort and time to order, receive and consume. What Reichelt noted was that humans were "expending almost no energy at all on getting to grips with this info, it's just there to take it all in if we want". <ref>Leisa Reichelt. Posted by Suw Charman-Anderson. http://strange.corante.com/2007/10/04/fowa07b-leisa-reichelt FOWA07b:</ref> Humans have stomachs that tell them when they are full, but the human brain did not evolve with that feeling. One must be mindful of intake and the effect it has on one's mental processes.		Why a junk food analogy? The promise of fast food is that it requires minimal effort and time to order, receive and consume. What Reichelt noted was that humans were "expending almost no energy at all on getting to grips with this info, it's just there to take it all in if we want". <ref>Leisa Reichelt. Posted by Suw Charman-Anderson. Published http://strange.corante.com/2007/10/04/fowa07b-leisa-reichelt FOWA07b:</ref> Humans have stomachs that tell them when they are full, but the human brain did not evolve with that feeling. One must be mindful of intake and the effect it has on one's mental processes.

	==References==		==References==

Caseorganic at 16:29, 30 September 2011

2011-09-30T16:29:43Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:29, 30 September 2011
Line 8:		Line 8:
	Many social network clients have notification settings that provide pop-ups that pop over windows on a computer screen, providing a tiny window into the lives of others. One can sit at an office computer all day and still feel connected to friends, because they are being let in on the lives and happening of others bit by bit, in tiny digestible pieces, over the course of the day.		Many social network clients have notification settings that provide pop-ups that pop over windows on a computer screen, providing a tiny window into the lives of others. One can sit at an office computer all day and still feel connected to friends, because they are being let in on the lives and happening of others bit by bit, in tiny digestible pieces, over the course of the day.

	The mundanity of this informational exchange might seem off-putting at first. Indeed, that's what drove so many away from Twitter in the first place, but these pieces of information build up over time to create larger narratives and important stories. Future Alex Soojung-Kim Pang writes that "Each little update — each individual bit of social information — is insignificant on its own, even supremely mundane. But taken together, over time, the little snippets coalesce into a surprisingly sophisticated portrait of your friends' and family members' lives, like thousands of dots making a pointillist painting. This was never before possible, because in the real world, no friend would bother to call you up and detail the sandwiches she was eating. The ambient information becomes like "a type of E.S.P.," as Haley described it to me, an invisible dimension floating over everyday life...".<ref>Brave New World of Digital Intimacy (NYT) http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/07/magazine/07awareness-t.html?_r=1</ref>		The mundanity of this informational exchange might seem off-putting at first. Indeed, that's what drove so many away from Twitter in the first place, but these pieces of information build up over time to create larger narratives and important stories. Future Alex Soojung-Kim Pang writes that "Each little update — each individual bit of social information — is insignificant on its own, even supremely mundane. But taken together, over time, the little snippets coalesce into a surprisingly sophisticated portrait of your friends' and family members' lives, like thousands of dots making a pointillist painting. This was never before possible, because in the real world, no friend would bother to call you up and detail the sandwiches she was eating. The ambient information becomes like "a type of E.S.P.," as Haley described it to me, an invisible dimension floating over everyday life...".<ref>Brave New World of Digital Intimacy (NYT) http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/07/magazine/07awareness-t.html?_r=1</ref> This "invisible dimension floating over everyday life" is the chief concern of those who create rapidly accessed and changing information technologies. Facebook's algorithm strives to keep information displayed relevant, and, if not relevant, interesting enough to browse through and click on. Twitter basically sets new users as default "socially opted out" until they gather content to follow. When they encounter something they don't like, they're free to drop them.

	This "invisible dimension floating over everyday life" is the chief concern of those who create rapidly accessed and changing information technologies. Facebook's algorithm strives to keep information displayed relevant, and, if not relevant, interesting enough to browse through and click on. Twitter basically sets new users as default "socially opted out" until they gather content to follow. When they encounter something they don't like, they're free to drop them.

	The paradox and allure of ambient awareness lies in its shape. It's not that we're always connected, but that we have always ability to connect. This is ambient intimacy, where connectivity is only a button away. Where sharing and connecting with another is not defined by geography but technosocial capability. David Weinberger called it "continual partial friendship", and Johnnie Moore pointed out that, "it's not about being poked and prodded, it's about exposing more surface area for others to connect with". Reality theorist [[Sheldon Renan]] calls it "Loosely but deeply entangled". Whatever you call it, it is a higher order of connectivity than we've ever experienced before as humans. We are beginning to see a new sense of time - the collective now.		The paradox and allure of ambient awareness lies in its shape. It's not that we're always connected, but that we have always ability to connect. This is ambient intimacy, where connectivity is only a button away. Where sharing and connecting with another is not defined by geography but technosocial capability. David Weinberger called it "continual partial friendship", and Johnnie Moore pointed out that, "it's not about being poked and prodded, it's about exposing more surface area for others to connect with". Reality theorist [[Sheldon Renan]] calls it "Loosely but deeply entangled". Whatever you call it, it is a higher order of connectivity than we've ever experienced before as humans. We are beginning to see a new sense of time - the collective now.

Caseorganic at 16:29, 30 September 2011

2011-09-30T16:29:16Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:29, 30 September 2011
Line 18:		Line 18:
	For Leisa, these online social interactions are not the social equivalent of junk food. There are others who disagree. Anyone who has seen someone compulsively check an activity stream of information on their phone has a right to feel that these streams can become addicting. And rightly so, ambient intimacy is not a replacement for real-life interaction. It is more of an atmospheric communication, a set of small moments that are not intended to receive full attention: moments in the periphery. It is only when these peripheral moments become excessive and primary that they become digital junk food.		For Leisa, these online social interactions are not the social equivalent of junk food. There are others who disagree. Anyone who has seen someone compulsively check an activity stream of information on their phone has a right to feel that these streams can become addicting. And rightly so, ambient intimacy is not a replacement for real-life interaction. It is more of an atmospheric communication, a set of small moments that are not intended to receive full attention: moments in the periphery. It is only when these peripheral moments become excessive and primary that they become digital junk food.

	Why a junk food analogy? The promise of fast food is that it requires minimal effort and time to order, receive and consume. What Reichelt noted was that humans were "expending almost no energy at all on getting to grips with this info, it's just there to take it all in if we want". <ref>Leisa Reichelt. Posted by Suw Charman-Anderson. http://strange.corante.com/2007/10/04/fowa07b-leisa-reichelt FOWA07b:</ref>		Why a junk food analogy? The promise of fast food is that it requires minimal effort and time to order, receive and consume. What Reichelt noted was that humans were "expending almost no energy at all on getting to grips with this info, it's just there to take it all in if we want". <ref>Leisa Reichelt. Posted by Suw Charman-Anderson. http://strange.corante.com/2007/10/04/fowa07b-leisa-reichelt FOWA07b:</ref> Humans have stomachs that tell them when they are full, but the human brain did not evolve with that feeling. One must be mindful of intake and the effect it has on one's mental processes.

	==References==		==References==

Caseorganic at 16:28, 30 September 2011

2011-09-30T16:28:23Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:28, 30 September 2011
Line 2:		Line 2:

	===Definition===		===Definition===
	Ambient awareness is best defined by user experience designer [[Leisa Reichelt]]. One of her definitions is that ambient awareness "is about being able to keep in touch with people with a level of regularity and intimacy that you wouldn't usually have access to, because time and space conspire to make it impossible."<ref>[http://www.disambiguity.com/ambient-intimacy/ ~~Disambiguity -- Leisa Reichelt's Professional Blog.]~~</ref>		Ambient awareness is best defined by user experience designer [[Leisa Reichelt]]. One of her definitions is that ambient awareness "is about being able to keep in touch with people with a level of regularity and intimacy that you wouldn't usually have access to, because time and space conspire to make it impossible."<ref>Disambiguity -- Leisa Reichelt's Professional Blog. http://www.disambiguity.com/ambient-intimacy/</ref>

	Ambient awareness is a way of describing the idea of being "ambiently aware" of another's actions, thoughts and experiences without having to be near them physically, and without specifically requesting such information.		Ambient awareness is a way of describing the idea of being "ambiently aware" of another's actions, thoughts and experiences without having to be near them physically, and without specifically requesting such information.
Line 8:		Line 8:
	Many social network clients have notification settings that provide pop-ups that pop over windows on a computer screen, providing a tiny window into the lives of others. One can sit at an office computer all day and still feel connected to friends, because they are being let in on the lives and happening of others bit by bit, in tiny digestible pieces, over the course of the day.		Many social network clients have notification settings that provide pop-ups that pop over windows on a computer screen, providing a tiny window into the lives of others. One can sit at an office computer all day and still feel connected to friends, because they are being let in on the lives and happening of others bit by bit, in tiny digestible pieces, over the course of the day.

	The mundanity of this informational exchange might seem off-putting at first. Indeed, that's what drove so many away from Twitter in the first place, but these pieces of information build up over time to create larger narratives and important stories. Future Alex Soojung-Kim Pang writes that "Each little update — each individual bit of social information — is insignificant on its own, even supremely mundane. But taken together, over time, the little snippets coalesce into a surprisingly sophisticated portrait of your friends' and family members' lives, like thousands of dots making a pointillist painting. This was never before possible, because in the real world, no friend would bother to call you up and detail the sandwiches she was eating. The ambient information becomes like "a type of E.S.P.," as Haley described it to me, an invisible dimension floating over everyday life...".<ref>[http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/07/magazine/07awareness-t.html?_r=1 ~~Brave New World of Digital Intimacy (NYT)]~~</ref>		The mundanity of this informational exchange might seem off-putting at first. Indeed, that's what drove so many away from Twitter in the first place, but these pieces of information build up over time to create larger narratives and important stories. Future Alex Soojung-Kim Pang writes that "Each little update — each individual bit of social information — is insignificant on its own, even supremely mundane. But taken together, over time, the little snippets coalesce into a surprisingly sophisticated portrait of your friends' and family members' lives, like thousands of dots making a pointillist painting. This was never before possible, because in the real world, no friend would bother to call you up and detail the sandwiches she was eating. The ambient information becomes like "a type of E.S.P.," as Haley described it to me, an invisible dimension floating over everyday life...".<ref>Brave New World of Digital Intimacy (NYT) http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/07/magazine/07awareness-t.html?_r=1</ref>

	This "invisible dimension floating over everyday life" is the chief concern of those who create rapidly accessed and changing information technologies. Facebook's algorithm strives to keep information displayed relevant, and, if not relevant, interesting enough to browse through and click on. Twitter basically sets new users as default "socially opted out" until they gather content to follow. When they encounter something they don't like, they're free to drop them.		This "invisible dimension floating over everyday life" is the chief concern of those who create rapidly accessed and changing information technologies. Facebook's algorithm strives to keep information displayed relevant, and, if not relevant, interesting enough to browse through and click on. Twitter basically sets new users as default "socially opted out" until they gather content to follow. When they encounter something they don't like, they're free to drop them.
Line 18:		Line 18:
	For Leisa, these online social interactions are not the social equivalent of junk food. There are others who disagree. Anyone who has seen someone compulsively check an activity stream of information on their phone has a right to feel that these streams can become addicting. And rightly so, ambient intimacy is not a replacement for real-life interaction. It is more of an atmospheric communication, a set of small moments that are not intended to receive full attention: moments in the periphery. It is only when these peripheral moments become excessive and primary that they become digital junk food.		For Leisa, these online social interactions are not the social equivalent of junk food. There are others who disagree. Anyone who has seen someone compulsively check an activity stream of information on their phone has a right to feel that these streams can become addicting. And rightly so, ambient intimacy is not a replacement for real-life interaction. It is more of an atmospheric communication, a set of small moments that are not intended to receive full attention: moments in the periphery. It is only when these peripheral moments become excessive and primary that they become digital junk food.

	Why a junk food analogy? The promise of fast food is that it requires minimal effort and time to order, receive and consume. What Reichelt noted was that humans were "expending almost no energy at all on getting to grips with this info, it's just there to take it all in if we want". <ref>http://strange.corante.com/2007/10/04/fowa07b-leisa-reichelt FOWA07b: ~~Leisa Reichelt. Posted by Suw Charman-Anderson~~</ref>		Why a junk food analogy? The promise of fast food is that it requires minimal effort and time to order, receive and consume. What Reichelt noted was that humans were "expending almost no energy at all on getting to grips with this info, it's just there to take it all in if we want". <ref>Leisa Reichelt. Posted by Suw Charman-Anderson. http://strange.corante.com/2007/10/04/fowa07b-leisa-reichelt FOWA07b:</ref>

	==References==		==References==
	<references />		<references />



	*[http://www.awareness.id.tue.nl/main.php?include=publications&titel=Publications Publications in the field of Ambient Awareness by researchers at the Ambient Awareness Project based in the Netherlands]
	*[http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/07/magazine/07awareness-t.html I’m so Digitally Close to You]
	*[http://www.klastrup.dk/?p=1484 Ambient awareness, lifestreams and personal storytelling. Will it change my relation to You?]
	*[http://www.endofcyberspace.com/2008/09/clive-thompson.html The End of Cyberspace - Clive Thompson on Ambient Awareness].


	[[Category:Book Pages]]		[[Category:Book Pages]]